Inspect the source asset
Open the original file before making changes. For CSM AI output, record its format, units, dependencies, and current source inputs so the provenance disclosure pass has a reliable baseline.
Plan provenance disclosure for CSM AI output. Review the source, test the destination export, and document settings, evidence, and open risks.
Open the original file before making changes. For CSM AI output, record its format, units, dependencies, and current source inputs so the provenance disclosure pass has a reliable baseline.
During provenance disclosure for CSM AI output, establish the expected state of source inputs. Resolve or document any gap before moving on to generation or capture method.
Do not rely on the authoring viewport alone. For provenance disclosure, load a representative export in CSM AI output and verify generation or capture method together with major human edits.
For CSM AI output, keep the accepted export, its settings, and a short note about unresolved risks. Name the person responsible for the final review of provenance disclosure.
The practical approach is straightforward: for CSM AI output, begin with source inputs, then test generation or capture method and major human edits in the actual destination. Keep the accepted export settings and any unresolved provenance disclosure risks with the source file.
CSM AI output is a starting point, not proof that an asset is production-ready. A provenance disclosure pass should distinguish generation artifacts from deliberate form before anyone spends time polishing the result.
For CSM AI output, keep source links, license terms, generation or capture method, and material edits with the asset. Escalate unclear rights or disclosure requirements instead of guessing from the file contents.
Record the generation or capture tool, source inputs, major human edits, restrictions, and the reviewer responsible for disclosure. Apply this provenance disclosure guidance to the actual CSM AI output delivery path.
| provenance disclosure check for CSM AI output | CSM AI output pass condition for provenance disclosure | Evidence to keep for CSM AI output provenance disclosure |
|---|---|---|
| source inputs during provenance disclosure for CSM AI output | For CSM AI output provenance disclosure, the source and revised asset use an agreed value for source inputs. | Keep CSM AI output provenance disclosure before-and-after values and the setting that changed. |
| generation or capture method during provenance disclosure for CSM AI output | The provenance disclosure result for generation or capture method matches the expected behavior in CSM AI output, not only in the editor. | Keep target-side evidence for CSM AI output provenance disclosure, such as an import log or captured test. |
| major human edits during provenance disclosure for CSM AI output | The recorded result for major human edits meets the CSM AI output release requirement for this provenance disclosure job. | Keep the accepted CSM AI output result and the reviewer name for provenance disclosure. |
| rights and restrictions after provenance disclosure for CSM AI output | The provenance disclosure handoff for CSM AI output contains only the files needed downstream. | Keep the CSM AI output export preset, fallback, dependencies, and open risks from provenance disclosure. |
For CSM AI output, define the asset, destination, and release condition before editing. Keep a clean source copy and state why source inputs is relevant to provenance disclosure.
For provenance disclosure in CSM AI output, treat unresolved generation or capture method as blocking. Decide whether it needs a technical fix, additional evidence, or a qualified reviewer.
For provenance disclosure, require a representative result in CSM AI output, the accepted export settings, and a clear outcome for major human edits. Record who approved the final package.
During provenance disclosure, compare the source and destination values for source inputs. Do not continue until the difference is explained and assigned to the asset or the CSM AI output pipeline.
For provenance disclosure, capture the CSM AI output result and isolate the responsible layer. A clean authoring preview is not proof when the exported generation or capture method result no longer matches the baseline.
Define an observable provenance disclosure result or move the decision to a qualified CSM AI output reviewer. Do not hide an unresolved major human edits risk behind a general “ready” status.
For CSM AI output, start with source inputs on the untouched source file. It gives you a baseline before the provenance disclosure pass changes geometry, materials, metadata, or export settings.
During provenance disclosure for CSM AI output, record the source format, units, texture locations, material slots, exporter, destination version, and observed generation or capture method behavior.
The provenance disclosure pass is complete when source inputs, generation or capture method, and major human edits have been tested in CSM AI output, the export opens correctly, and remaining review has an owner.
For CSM AI output, use a qualified reviewer during provenance disclosure when major human edits cannot be verified automatically or when licensing, device, marketplace, or domain rules affect approval.